ci: pr conventional commits validator

[SoulPancake]

Description

What problem is being solved?

How is it being solved?

What changes are made to solve it?

References

Review Checklist

• I have clicked on "allow edits by maintainers".
• I have added documentation for new/changed functionality in this PR or in a PR to openfga.dev [Provide a link to any relevant PRs in the references section above]
• The correct base branch is being used, if not main
• I have added tests to validate that the change in functionality is working as expected

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration to enforce pull request title conventions during the review process.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 049c571f-0105-46d5-8c0c-586a267046e2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f89e71 and a447f8b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/pr-title-conventional-commit.yml

---

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow is added that validates PR titles conform to conventional commit conventions. The workflow triggers on PR events and runs the pr-conventional-commits action with specific allowed commit types and configuration options.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow .github/workflows/pr-title-conventional-commit.yml	New workflow file that enforces conventional commit format for PR titles using the ytanikin/pr-conventional-commits action (v1.5.1), triggered on PR open/reopen/synchronize/edit events targeting the main branch. Configured with allowed task types (feat, fix, docs, test, refactor, ci, perf, chore, revert) and label creation disabled.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the main change: adding a CI workflow for PR title validation using conventional commits conventions.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch ci/pr-cc-val

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 71.17%. Comparing base (4f89e71) to head (a447f8b).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #260   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.17%   71.17%           
=======================================
  Files         137      137           
  Lines       11100    11100           
=======================================
  Hits         7900     7900           
  Misses       3200     3200           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.